Options AI Screener Desk

Session 2026-09-22 · Tue built 10:52 ET

No new names today, and for once the market is not the reason. The morning scan never arrived — the stock universe this desk selects from is still showing Friday's session — so there was nothing to screen. The tape itself looks fine: the regime reading is the strongest in a week and the trend scan fired thirteen buys against two sells. What this page carries instead is the record, re-priced, and it is not comfortable reading. The book has turned firmly negative, and the single strongest negative rule this desk has published for three weeks failed the first honest test of it.

Data freshness

The core stock universe did not refresh this morning; it still holds Friday's session, as do the signal and rotation lists. The sector table, the trend scan and the options-income table are current as of 10:38 ET, and those are what the market read below rests on. No stock was screened, scored or selected against stale data — that is why there are no names rather than a shorter list. One rates feed was unreachable. Everything in the performance section below is priced live.

Gates

Regime clears comfortably. The stop today came before any gate.
0 · DataFired · stopped the run universe is one day oldThe stock universe did not refresh. Nothing was screened. This gate exists so a stale list is never presented as a fresh one.
1 · RegimeWould clear 75 · risk-onWell above the 70 line, up from 70 on Friday, and the label agrees with the number. VIX 14.42, five-day VIX −16.2%. Strongest reading in a week.
2 · LeadershipWould fire all top 5 negativeBOAT −26.6, SKYY −36.3, IGV −22.7, SOXX −18.8, BLOK −8.8. Ninth session running. Would have capped the list at three.
3 · Intraday heatNot run no candidatesNothing to measure.
3b · EarningsNot run no candidatesNothing to measure.
3c · RSISkipped by ruleSkipped deliberately on a stand-down: with no finalists there is no flag-time RSI to record, so the fetch is pure cost.
4 · BreadthNarrow 14 of 39 · 35.9%Below half, but the widest reading in five sessions and up from 28.2% on Friday.

Where money is moving

Rotation into technology continues. Energy has kept falling.
SectorMomentumAccel1WRead
Shipping · BOAT+9.85−26.59+1.68%Still first on the long windows, flat on the short ones
Cloud · SKYY+9.58−36.33+3.34%Up 3.82% today; fastest deceleration in the table for a third session
Software · IGV+7.70−22.70+2.07%Recovered through the week after a soft patch
Semiconductors · SOXX+7.50−18.82+12.04%Strongest one-week number anywhere in the table; +7.67% in three sessions
Crypto · BLOK+6.07−8.81+5.51%Mildest deceleration of the five leaders, and +9.98% in three days
Artificial Intelligence · AIQ+5.53−15.54+4.83%Positive on every window
Nuclear & Uranium · URA+0.04+7.96+3.42%The only sector tagged as turning, and one of five with positive acceleration
Energy · XLE−2.28−13.68−6.42%Now negative on momentum, 23rd of 39, and −6.4% on the week. Twenty-one of the thirty-nine prior picks sit here

Fourteen of 39 sectors carry positive momentum, the widest in five sessions, and the trend scan fired thirteen buys against two sells. But all five leaders are still decelerating — the ninth consecutive session — so the strength is in the short windows, not the long ones. The clearest fact in the table is Energy: it has gone from first to 23rd and from positive momentum to negative in three weeks, and it is where more than half of this desk's history is invested.

Today's call

No new names today — the scan did not run

This is a stand-down, but not the usual kind. On the two previous stand-downs the regime reading had collapsed and the market itself said no. Today the market reads fine: the regime score is 75, its best in a week; thirteen names fired fresh buy signals against two sells; breadth is the widest in five sessions. The reason there is no list is that the universe of stocks this desk selects from never refreshed this morning — it still holds Friday's session.

Screening Friday's list and presenting it as Tuesday's work would have produced a perfectly plausible three names. It would also have been fiction, and it is exactly the failure this desk is built to refuse. No stock was scored, no name was flagged, and nothing was added to the record.

75 REGIME · RISK-ON · would have allowed a full list
055 · stand down70 · full list100

What would have qualified: had the universe been current, the list would have been capped at three by decelerating leadership, and the hunting ground would have been semiconductors, software and cloud — not Energy. The selection rule would have been relative strength above twenty, which is the one measure below that is still working.

Options structures

The income screener is current and independent of the outage.

With no finalists there is nothing to pair a structure with, so no setup is presented today. The cash-secured-put screener did refresh normally — 948 contracts across 155 names, built on live options data rather than the stale stock list — and it reads the same regime the rest of this page does: risk-on at 75, with implied volatility low (VIX 14.4, down 16% on the week) and sentiment nonetheless tagged fear at 37. Low volatility with fearful positioning is a poor premium-selling backdrop: you are paid little to carry the risk. The bull-put-spread table was not rebuilt today, so no spread is quoted. No LEAP call surfaced, which is just as well: that structure's record on this desk is −$90.8k.

Thirty-nine picks, eleven flagging sessions

Alpha versus SPY from each flag-date close, re-priced at 10:38 ET.
CohortMean alphaMedianBeat SPYBestWorst
2026-08-31 · 7+1.71%−3.98%3/7CVI +25.6%ESTC −12.7%
2026-09-01 · 7−4.34%−1.03%3/7CRWD +5.8%PRGS −15.3%
2026-09-02 · 3−14.07%−14.51%0/3VET −12.5%HP −15.2%
2026-09-03 · 3−6.20%−5.43%0/3PFE −3.5%ZYME −9.7%
2026-09-08 · 3−6.86%−6.92%0/3ELPC −0.6%MTDR −13.1%
2026-09-11 · 3−2.30%−5.22%1/3TEN +4.5%UROY −6.2%
2026-09-15 · 3−10.99%−8.39%0/3CVE −7.9%SM −16.7%
2026-09-16 · 2−7.98%−7.98%0/2MPC −6.7%LPG −9.3%
2026-09-17 · 3−5.25%−4.70%0/3SMTC −4.4%TRMD −6.6%
2026-09-18 · 2−2.47%−2.47%1/2ABCL +0.6%CMBT −5.6%
2026-09-21 · 3+5.82%+6.07%2/3ALAB +12.3%RBRK −0.9%
All 39−4.07%−5.43%10/39trimmed −4.71% · ex top two −5.32%

The weakness is broad, not concentrated — and that is the worse reading

Total alpha across 39 picks is −158.9 points: a mean of −4.07%, a median of −5.43%, and only 10 of 39 beating the index. A week ago the headline was positive. Trimming the two best and two worst names leaves −4.71%, and removing just the two best leaves −5.32% — so unlike every earlier reading of this book, no small group of names is responsible. The whole distribution has moved.

The cause is concentration. Twenty-one of thirty-nine picks — 54% — are Energy names, and four separate cohorts were 100% Energy. Energy has since gone from the top of the sector table to 23rd of 39. The one encouraging line is the last: Friday's three picks were the first cohort with no Energy exposure at all, and they are the best-performing cohort in the book at +5.82% after one session. One session is not evidence, but the direction is the one the sector read has been pointing at for a week.